<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Stuffing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization SEO &#38; Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya Mendoza</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-104429</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya Mendoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 08:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-104429</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan

This is a well put together explanation of keyword stuffing. Re Gary&#039;s question: Gary I would say it is safer to go up to a keyword density 2.5% but that 2% is more than adequate. Simply keep your content relevant and you will be fine. 

All the best ~ Maya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan</p>
<p>This is a well put together explanation of keyword stuffing. Re Gary&#8217;s question: Gary I would say it is safer to go up to a keyword density 2.5% but that 2% is more than adequate. Simply keep your content relevant and you will be fine. </p>
<p>All the best ~ Maya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-92864</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-92864</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your advice.  I often write reviews of products and do end up using the same words over and over again to describe the product.  It is what it is!  I can&#039;t call it something else!

Will that get me dinged by the search engines?  I&#039;d like to keep my sponsors happy AND keep my slowly growing PR!

Thanks for your advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your advice.  I often write reviews of products and do end up using the same words over and over again to describe the product.  It is what it is!  I can&#8217;t call it something else!</p>
<p>Will that get me dinged by the search engines?  I&#8217;d like to keep my sponsors happy AND keep my slowly growing PR!</p>
<p>Thanks for your advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Herpes Curable</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-88955</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Herpes Curable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-88955</guid>
		<description>Great article about keyword stuffing. Everything looks clearer now.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article about keyword stuffing. Everything looks clearer now.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary from how to build a dog house</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-56972</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary from how to build a dog house</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-56972</guid>
		<description>Hi Nathan,
Thanks this has cleared up keyword stuffing a little for me.
I try to get most of my sites to have a keyword density of 2-3%. I assume this is ok and is not stuffing in any way? The problem with trying to get this density is that occasionally it can start to look a little unnatural to use the keywords so often.
Thanks again
Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nathan,<br />
Thanks this has cleared up keyword stuffing a little for me.<br />
I try to get most of my sites to have a keyword density of 2-3%. I assume this is ok and is not stuffing in any way? The problem with trying to get this density is that occasionally it can start to look a little unnatural to use the keywords so often.<br />
Thanks again<br />
Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solenn Heussaff</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-49067</link>
		<dc:creator>Solenn Heussaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-49067</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fortunate to read your post. I can avoid penalty from google by not making any keyword stuffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fortunate to read your post. I can avoid penalty from google by not making any keyword stuffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Your Small Business Needs a Blog &#124; Getting Started</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Your Small Business Needs a Blog &#124; Getting Started</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] optimization (SEO). Many people think SEO and automatically associate negative practices such as “keyword stuffing,” but SEO is much more complicated than that. SEO is really just the practice of making your site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] optimization (SEO). Many people think SEO and automatically associate negative practices such as “keyword stuffing,” but SEO is much more complicated than that. SEO is really just the practice of making your site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trafficke Website Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Trafficke Website Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great article. Would you consider a description of a website (in sentence form) in the footer keyword stuffing? I agree that all major search engines see through keyword stuffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great article. Would you consider a description of a website (in sentence form) in the footer keyword stuffing? I agree that all major search engines see through keyword stuffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Cintra</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Cintra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. It&#039;s unfortunate so many websites and even &quot;seo firms&quot; resort to such techniques as keyword stuffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. It&#8217;s unfortunate so many websites and even &#8220;seo firms&#8221; resort to such techniques as keyword stuffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bascom</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bascom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Good eye, Chris. Nate&#039;s example is 167 characters, and is probably a bit long for the sole reason that the last few words would get cut off in a Google search listing (Google limit is 160). The meta description is used to entice visitors to click rather than improve rankings, so even if your description is too long, it will just get cut off. We don&#039;t normally stress too much about the length of the description. As long as you put the important stuff up front, it&#039;s not usually a big deal if it gets chopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good eye, Chris. Nate&#8217;s example is 167 characters, and is probably a bit long for the sole reason that the last few words would get cut off in a Google search listing (Google limit is 160). The meta description is used to entice visitors to click rather than improve rankings, so even if your description is too long, it will just get cut off. We don&#8217;t normally stress too much about the length of the description. As long as you put the important stuff up front, it&#8217;s not usually a big deal if it gets chopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Anderton</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Anderton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=820#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I agree with your article.  Search engines look at the relevance of the content.  The LSI algorithm is used to decide the relevance of words in content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your article.  Search engines look at the relevance of the content.  The LSI algorithm is used to decide the relevance of words in content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

