<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Canonical Link Tag Will Help with Duplicate Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization SEO &#38; Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Kanth</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna Kanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-7907</guid>
		<description>Can I use only Canonical instead of 301 Redirect. Please mail if possible else reply me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I use only Canonical instead of 301 Redirect. Please mail if possible else reply me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Koi Man</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>The Koi Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Alright, thanks Dave and Dan for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, thanks Dave and Dan for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schulz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-350</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Dave.  It&#039;s only for domains you control.  In other words, it&#039;s meant to be used only within a site, not across multiple sites (unless those sites are hosted on multiple subdomains associated with the same domain).

From the Google blog:

(Not sure if you folks accept HTML or not, so I&#039;m going to copy/paste it as unformatted text.)

-------------------------------
Can this link tag be used to suggest a canonical URL on a completely different domain?

No. To migrate to a completely different domain, permanent (301) redirects are more appropriate. Google currently will take canonicalization suggestions into account across subdomains (or within a domain), but not across domains. So site owners can suggest www.example.com vs. example.com vs. help.example.com, but not example.com vs. example-widgets.com.
-------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Dave.  It&#8217;s only for domains you control.  In other words, it&#8217;s meant to be used only within a site, not across multiple sites (unless those sites are hosted on multiple subdomains associated with the same domain).</p>
<p>From the Google blog:</p>
<p>(Not sure if you folks accept HTML or not, so I&#8217;m going to copy/paste it as unformatted text.)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Can this link tag be used to suggest a canonical URL on a completely different domain?</p>
<p>No. To migrate to a completely different domain, permanent (301) redirects are more appropriate. Google currently will take canonicalization suggestions into account across subdomains (or within a domain), but not across domains. So site owners can suggest <a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a> vs. example.com vs. help.example.com, but not example.com vs. example-widgets.com.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bascom</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bascom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-349</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re all still trying to understand this new feature, too, but as far as I understand, it is for domains that you own/control, and only for identical content, not scraped or syndicated content pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re all still trying to understand this new feature, too, but as far as I understand, it is for domains that you own/control, and only for identical content, not scraped or syndicated content pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Koi Man</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>The Koi Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Is this Canonical Link Tag relating to just on site tagging or across the web?  For example if I wrote an article and posted on my site first and then submitted to several article directories, search engines will know that I am the original source?  Help me out please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this Canonical Link Tag relating to just on site tagging or across the web?  For example if I wrote an article and posted on my site first and then submitted to several article directories, search engines will know that I am the original source?  Help me out please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/search-engine-news/new-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=778#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Here is the article from Google...good stuff!

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html

Joost de Valk&#039;s Wordpress Plugin is pretty cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the article from Google&#8230;good stuff!</p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html</a></p>
<p>Joost de Valk&#8217;s WordPress Plugin is pretty cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

