<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop that Bouncing!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization SEO &#38; Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Scoville</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>David Scoville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=2125#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Hi Allen, thanks for the comment. I took a glance at your site--I admire the fact that you&#039;re pushing &quot;green&quot;.

About your question, Google is a lot smarter than we think. Useful content is still useful content. Yes, bounce rate plays an effect but it is probably not big enough to hurt your site&#039;s rankings when you are displaying &quot;quick reference&quot; &lt;strong&gt;useful &lt;/strong&gt;content. Real useful content is &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seo.com/blog/seo-tips/content-link-thirsty/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link-thirsty&lt;/a&gt;&quot; i.e.  you&#039;re bound to get backlinks from it. Thus, Google will probably overlook your high bounce rate because of the number of backlinks you&#039;d get.

Keep in mind, your example situation is not very likely. If I&#039;m searching for quick information and I find it on your site from searching Google, then I&#039;m probably not going to hit the back button to find a better site with the same information. Once I&#039;ve found my information, I&#039;m done searching for that topic... no bouncing. I might reiterate something that will probably never change in SEO: Content is King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Allen, thanks for the comment. I took a glance at your site&#8211;I admire the fact that you&#8217;re pushing &#8220;green&#8221;.</p>
<p>About your question, Google is a lot smarter than we think. Useful content is still useful content. Yes, bounce rate plays an effect but it is probably not big enough to hurt your site&#8217;s rankings when you are displaying &#8220;quick reference&#8221; <strong>useful </strong>content. Real useful content is &#8220;<a href="http://www.seo.com/blog/seo-tips/content-link-thirsty/" rel="nofollow">link-thirsty</a>&#8221; i.e.  you&#8217;re bound to get backlinks from it. Thus, Google will probably overlook your high bounce rate because of the number of backlinks you&#8217;d get.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, your example situation is not very likely. If I&#8217;m searching for quick information and I find it on your site from searching Google, then I&#8217;m probably not going to hit the back button to find a better site with the same information. Once I&#8217;ve found my information, I&#8217;m done searching for that topic&#8230; no bouncing. I might reiterate something that will probably never change in SEO: Content is King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=2125#comment-547</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting topic: on one hand you don&#039;t want to be penalized for users finding what they need right away, and on the other hand user friendliness is defined as such. As Garry pointed out, his conversions are high on 1 page, so bounces are not defined as lost conversions in this case.
My question is this: if you have a multiple page site and have a page that is a resource for quick info that is unrelated to the rest of your website (but is still useful content) is the high bounce rate on the page worth the traffic, or is the rest of your site penalized by Google for the bounce rate for that 1 page.  Is high bounce rate on 1 page worth the added traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting topic: on one hand you don&#8217;t want to be penalized for users finding what they need right away, and on the other hand user friendliness is defined as such. As Garry pointed out, his conversions are high on 1 page, so bounces are not defined as lost conversions in this case.<br />
My question is this: if you have a multiple page site and have a page that is a resource for quick info that is unrelated to the rest of your website (but is still useful content) is the high bounce rate on the page worth the traffic, or is the rest of your site penalized by Google for the bounce rate for that 1 page.  Is high bounce rate on 1 page worth the added traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bascom</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bascom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=2125#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Good point, Garry. Bounce rate should not be the only metric that you look at, or you&#039;ll miss the big picture. Many sites are designed to only generate one page view. If you get 50% of your customers calling you after a single page view, the site is probably making you a lot of money, so a high &quot;bounce rate&quot; is fine. However, cases like this are the exception, and in most situations, a high bounce rate is a signal that something isn&#039;t working right. Either you&#039;ve got the wrong people coming to the site who aren&#039;t interested, or your offer isn&#039;t right for the audience, or you&#039;re not presenting the offer in the right way. As you make the adjustments to improve these things, bounce rate will improve as will the overall effectiveness of your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Garry. Bounce rate should not be the only metric that you look at, or you&#8217;ll miss the big picture. Many sites are designed to only generate one page view. If you get 50% of your customers calling you after a single page view, the site is probably making you a lot of money, so a high &#8220;bounce rate&#8221; is fine. However, cases like this are the exception, and in most situations, a high bounce rate is a signal that something isn&#8217;t working right. Either you&#8217;ve got the wrong people coming to the site who aren&#8217;t interested, or your offer isn&#8217;t right for the audience, or you&#8217;re not presenting the offer in the right way. As you make the adjustments to improve these things, bounce rate will improve as will the overall effectiveness of your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/stop-that-bouncing/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=2125#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that a &quot;bounce&quot; is purely a one page visit? Doesn&#039;t it take into account the amount of time spent on the page? The reason I ask is my site has a high bounce rate, but that&#039;s because most visitors come for one reason which is usually satisfied on that page. However, I have pretty good search engine results for the site.

Overall, I understand the concept, but it seems rather shallow unless they are also looking at time spent on the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that a &#8220;bounce&#8221; is purely a one page visit? Doesn&#8217;t it take into account the amount of time spent on the page? The reason I ask is my site has a high bounce rate, but that&#8217;s because most visitors come for one reason which is usually satisfied on that page. However, I have pretty good search engine results for the site.</p>
<p>Overall, I understand the concept, but it seems rather shallow unless they are also looking at time spent on the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

