<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synonyms Instead of Stuffing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization SEO &#38; Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:42:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Blog Academy. Com</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-26473</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Blog Academy. Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-26473</guid>
		<description>@David Malmborg, 

Though it is really a good approach of using synonym keywords instead of keyword stuffing but it appears a bit confusing about how to calculate actual keyword density of keywords used in the body.

It is said that keyword density is important in terms of setting the relevancy of the page with the search terms then the question arise is how can we calculate the weight of the page in terms of keyword density when using synonym as keywords.

For example - If I am using keyword &quot;Yoga for pregnancy&quot; 5 times per 100 words then it stands as 5% but what if I am using the synonyms &quot;Yoga for pregnancy&quot; 3 times and &quot;Prenatal yoga&quot; 2 times. 

Does it makes a complete keyword density of 5% for prenatal yoga and yoga for pregnancy as well or it individually stands as 3% and 2% for their respective density?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Malmborg, </p>
<p>Though it is really a good approach of using synonym keywords instead of keyword stuffing but it appears a bit confusing about how to calculate actual keyword density of keywords used in the body.</p>
<p>It is said that keyword density is important in terms of setting the relevancy of the page with the search terms then the question arise is how can we calculate the weight of the page in terms of keyword density when using synonym as keywords.</p>
<p>For example &#8211; If I am using keyword &#8220;Yoga for pregnancy&#8221; 5 times per 100 words then it stands as 5% but what if I am using the synonyms &#8220;Yoga for pregnancy&#8221; 3 times and &#8220;Prenatal yoga&#8221; 2 times. </p>
<p>Does it makes a complete keyword density of 5% for prenatal yoga and yoga for pregnancy as well or it individually stands as 3% and 2% for their respective density?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Blog Academy. Com</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-26213</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Blog Academy. Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-26213</guid>
		<description>Really this should be one of the compulsory keyword implementation theory that should be learned by all SEO masters including me. This is a better approach of using keywords in synonyms so that we can get traced for max number of keywords used by the users.

As we all know that previously everyone would like to pay more intention for a single more common keyword to rank in SERP, but practicing that strategy is nothing but ignore huge traffic that comes in small numbers from different keywords that are synonymous.

So, synonym keyword use not only increase the chance of getting found by lots of other users but also helps us get rid of risk of google penalty due to keyword stuffing and helps in increasing the relevancy of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really this should be one of the compulsory keyword implementation theory that should be learned by all SEO masters including me. This is a better approach of using keywords in synonyms so that we can get traced for max number of keywords used by the users.</p>
<p>As we all know that previously everyone would like to pay more intention for a single more common keyword to rank in SERP, but practicing that strategy is nothing but ignore huge traffic that comes in small numbers from different keywords that are synonymous.</p>
<p>So, synonym keyword use not only increase the chance of getting found by lots of other users but also helps us get rid of risk of google penalty due to keyword stuffing and helps in increasing the relevancy of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SynDigg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-23702</link>
		<dc:creator>SynDigg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-23702</guid>
		<description>Hello, We&#039;ve launched in the weekend a new project which should be very useful to find related keywords and synonyms. We will digg at least 1 keyword every dag, so if you want us to digg a specific word you can send us an e-mail.

@Tim: Like David said in the article, use semantic words ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, We&#8217;ve launched in the weekend a new project which should be very useful to find related keywords and synonyms. We will digg at least 1 keyword every dag, so if you want us to digg a specific word you can send us an e-mail.</p>
<p>@Tim: Like David said in the article, use semantic words <img src='http://www.seo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-23560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-23560</guid>
		<description>I have an interesting problem with synonyms. I&#039;m trying to optimize a page for &quot;trackmobile&quot; which is a railcar mover for material moving. However, the results are littered with &quot;track mobile&quot; referring to mobile devices. I&#039;m having trouble moving my client to page one of Google due to the junk in the way.

Does anyone have any advice on how to get around this annoying issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an interesting problem with synonyms. I&#8217;m trying to optimize a page for &#8220;trackmobile&#8221; which is a railcar mover for material moving. However, the results are littered with &#8220;track mobile&#8221; referring to mobile devices. I&#8217;m having trouble moving my client to page one of Google due to the junk in the way.</p>
<p>Does anyone have any advice on how to get around this annoying issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liza</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-21717</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-21717</guid>
		<description>Even though Google is by far the search engine that we should be focusing on, Yahoo and Bing combined are still valuable and can drive a bit of traffic and can&#039;t be left out. However, this is great encouragement for SEOs to stop stuffing keywords into every sentence and opt for some synonyms instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Google is by far the search engine that we should be focusing on, Yahoo and Bing combined are still valuable and can drive a bit of traffic and can&#8217;t be left out. However, this is great encouragement for SEOs to stop stuffing keywords into every sentence and opt for some synonyms instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Malmborg</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-21700</link>
		<dc:creator>David Malmborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-21700</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys, thanks for the comments. 

I should have mentioned Yahoo and Bing, and didn&#039;t even think of it. But it is true that neither one use synonyms, and I have heard their stemming is not near as complete as Google&#039;s. However, since 70%+ of searches are done on Google, I think it is a good practice to consider for any website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys, thanks for the comments. </p>
<p>I should have mentioned Yahoo and Bing, and didn&#8217;t even think of it. But it is true that neither one use synonyms, and I have heard their stemming is not near as complete as Google&#8217;s. However, since 70%+ of searches are done on Google, I think it is a good practice to consider for any website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alethea SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-21662</link>
		<dc:creator>Alethea SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-21662</guid>
		<description>I agree with Aaron. Yahoo and Bing aren&#039;t as advance in their algorithms as Google so it is going to be harder to keep or gain rankings using synonyms in those search engines. Testing synonyms will be good for secondary pages for now (or if lol) until Yahoo and Bing catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Aaron. Yahoo and Bing aren&#8217;t as advance in their algorithms as Google so it is going to be harder to keep or gain rankings using synonyms in those search engines. Testing synonyms will be good for secondary pages for now (or if lol) until Yahoo and Bing catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-21637</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-21637</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful post.  I think that using synonyms is going to get you further than keyword stuffing, if only because you&#039;ve got broader keyword coverage in your content.

The spoilers here are Yahoo and Bing, which do a much poorer job of stemming than Google.  For example, it&#039;s not uncommon to see oneself on page one in Yahoo for the singular of a noun, but dozens of position below for the plural of the same word (or vice versa), let alone anywhere in the same ballpark for more complex word relationships.

A note that  alt attributes offer excellent opportunities for using synonyms, especially when you&#039;re forced to use the &quot;correct&quot; for of the word in copy.  For example, the annual NFL championship contest is the &quot;Super Bowl&quot; yet users search equally for &quot;Superbowl&quot;.  Adding a &quot;Superbowl&quot; alt to your Super Bowl page image header, pointing an internal image based &quot;Superbowl&quot; link and, if possible, an external text anchor will give you plenty of juice for the synonym.  Just sticking to &quot;Super Bowl&quot; alone won&#039;t give you what you need to rank for &quot;Superbowl&quot;, especially in second-tier (non-Google:) engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful post.  I think that using synonyms is going to get you further than keyword stuffing, if only because you&#8217;ve got broader keyword coverage in your content.</p>
<p>The spoilers here are Yahoo and Bing, which do a much poorer job of stemming than Google.  For example, it&#8217;s not uncommon to see oneself on page one in Yahoo for the singular of a noun, but dozens of position below for the plural of the same word (or vice versa), let alone anywhere in the same ballpark for more complex word relationships.</p>
<p>A note that  alt attributes offer excellent opportunities for using synonyms, especially when you&#8217;re forced to use the &#8220;correct&#8221; for of the word in copy.  For example, the annual NFL championship contest is the &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221; yet users search equally for &#8220;Superbowl&#8221;.  Adding a &#8220;Superbowl&#8221; alt to your Super Bowl page image header, pointing an internal image based &#8220;Superbowl&#8221; link and, if possible, an external text anchor will give you plenty of juice for the synonym.  Just sticking to &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221; alone won&#8217;t give you what you need to rank for &#8220;Superbowl&#8221;, especially in second-tier (non-Google:) engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.seo.com/blog/synonyms-instead-of-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-21591</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo.com/?p=3432#comment-21591</guid>
		<description>Check keyword density of a website using free online tool at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webtoolhub.com/tn561367-keyword-density-checker.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webtoolhub.com/tn561367-keyword-density-checker.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check keyword density of a website using free online tool at <a href="http://www.webtoolhub.com/tn561367-keyword-density-checker.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.webtoolhub.com/tn561367-keyword-density-checker.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
