[Infographic] Google Wages War on Spam

Google-war-on-spam-infographic-thumb

To maintain dominance in the search engine optimization market, Google constantly researches and adjusts its algorithm to provide the best search results for users. Google makes small updates all the time and these updates have become known as the Google Dance. Major algorithm updates, which have a big impact on search results, happen far less frequently. These updates are usually targeted at a specific problem, usually an area that is allowing spam to rank well in the search results. Major algorithm updates have had such an impact on search results that Webmaster World decided to start naming the updates at SES in Boston in 2003. The first update to receive a name was called the Boston update.

 

Google's War on Spam infographic

Boston Update (March 2003) – The Boston update focused on incoming links and unique content. The result was that many webmasters reported a drop in backlinks and a corresponding drop in PageRank.

Cassandra Update (April 2003) – This update focused on domain name relevance. The idea was that companies should choose a name that reflects their domain name.

Dominic Update (May 2003) – This update was named after the pizza restaurant in Boston that was visited often by PubCon attendees. The update focused on making the search process theme based, and linking a data center to a particular search. The update made it clear that each data center was meant to do different things.

Esmerelda Update (June 2003) – The third in a series of updates that gave preference to pages that gave more specific information to a visitor. The update revealed that internal pages within a website may have better relevance for the Dominic update, which seemed to give the homepage preference to even searches that were aimed at a specific query. Users reported that spam was considerably less than after the Dominic and Cassandra updates.

Florida Update (November 2003) – The update reflected Google’s shift from simple filters to an attempt to understand contextually the scope of the search and potential search results. The update cleaned up spam with simple linking and other features that gave more weight to well optimized and cleanly linked sites. Webmasters welcomed the update and it showed that Google was giving top priority to the searchers’ interests. The update was an attempt to encourage white hat websites, which adhered to the quality requirements.

Austin Update (January 2004) – The update focused on a practice called Google Bombing, where people manipulated the system to produce misleading results. The focus shifted to sites with minimal keyword density and good internal linking. Relevant links were given more weight in that sites that linked to other sites in a similar industry did better in the search results.

Brandy Update (February 2004) – Google placed more emphasis on words like trust, authority and reputation. Update showed that providing relevant information is the key. There was greater importance placed on the quality of content on a website. Google also stressed the importance of Latent Semantic Indexing.

Allegra Update (February 2005) – This was an attempt by Google to identify spam sites that still managed to rank high in the search results. Google asked users to give feedback about sites that actually deserved higher rankings but did not receive them. Users complained that their sites disappeared from the search results and that some spam sites still ranked well.

Bourbon Update (May 2005) – Google launched this update in response to spam complaints and re-inclusion requests. Strategic changes in the process were implemented to make it more effective. The update also focused on moving from old data centers to new ones.

Jagger Update (October / November 2005) – Google encouraged users to give feedback concerning websites that used black hat SEO strategies to rank well. Sites which were found to be using such techniques were removed from the search results. Google cleaned up canonical problems and focused on relevance in reciprocal linking.

Big Daddy (February 2006) – Google focused on inbound and outbound links. Sites that have very low trust in links, or linked out to many spam sites saw pages disappear from the index. Spam sites were moved into a supplemental category in the search results. Users noticed that even after complying with Google’s “help” that their websites were still going “supplemental.”

Pluto Update (August 2006) – Update focused on backlinks reported by Google. There were no significant changes in search engine results.

Caffeine Update (August 2009) – Update focused on infrastructure to allow Google to better index information online, and do it much faster. It enabled deeper processing, which allowed Google to deliver more relevant search results. This update eventually allowed Google to introduce page speed as a ranking factor.

Mayday Update (May 2010) – Google launched update that focused on long tail traffic.

Panda Update (February 2011) – Google cracked down on content farms and sites that had low quality, thin or scraped content. Focus was placed on unique content and content depth. Many websites were affected by the update. Most content farms got hit hard. The Panda update has been rolled out in several steps throughout the year.

Major updates from Google were typically focused on improving search results and the ability to index information on the Internet. Google has also launched updates to give more information to users and improve the overall experience. These updates include:

Universal Search (May 2007) – Universal Search ranked images, videos, news websites and other results into the same search results pages. The feature allowed people to search everything on a specific topic.

Real-Time Search (December 2009) – Google incorporated information from sources like Twitter, Facebook and blogs into its search results, giving users the ability to find the most recent information on trends about a certain topic.

Google Instant (September 2010) – Google Instant took what users typed and completed it with the most likely string of words. The result was a smarter, faster search engine that was interactive, predictive and powerful.

Google Places (October 2010) – Places were Google’s new local search results that organized information based on location. The results allowed users to easily decide where to go.

Get Internet Marketing Insight For Your Company - SEO.com

9 Comments

  1. Madeline says

    Thanks for putting together the infograph. It was helpful to see all the major updates Google has gone through. Though, it is surprising just how many updates there have been.

  2. Tyche webs Technologies says

    You Described This post with simple and Impressive way. Really Great Post About Google algorithms and Update. Thaks for such nice Post. plaese Keep continue in future also…

  3. Jamar L. Hansen says

    It’s all over the all of the internet – blogs and newspaper headlines read things like the increasing uselessness of Google are becoming common. Why is this?

    • Steven TRACY says

      Very simple

      Google is favoring the company’s that paye them cash.

      Only normal and there is nothing wrong with that.

      You see, Google is a website, nothing more , nothing less.

      How do you make a succesfull website ?

      Easy, give off something free to attract visitor’s and propose adds, services or products to sell.

      Just propose a free service like a search engine, attract millions of visitors and sell adds. That’s what Google does.

      Their main problem as of today, is, that they are trying to compete with social websites.

      Google see’s social website’s as competitors. But they are not.

      Just do a search in facebook and you’ll quickly go to a real search engine website to find what you’re looking for.

      The big mistake Google is doing, is favoring social spam by taking in to consideration social web data.

      It’s polluting their original search ranking system.

      They’re going the wrong way, and they will loose many user’s who cant’t find ressources by searching with keywords through the good old search engine.

      User’s will type in keywords like “softdrink” and coca cola will be at the top because they asked all their employees to “like” and “+1″ their website, creating social spam.

      Thus Google is polluting their good old search engine with social spam.

      So, try out duckduckgo for example. a genuine search engine that delivers genuine results.

  4. Jae Rustia says

    a really nice infographic, very informative for someone who was still in junior high during 2003 and the use of internet is still not that popular (well that’s just on my case, we still depend more on books for research during that time plus the internet connection is way too expensive as well as desktops )

    anyway, i started in the digital marketing industry Nov, of 2010, i was still a novice when the very first Panda Update rolled out, and man, that was a gruesome experience, being new in the industry, i dont know how to explain to our clients why their websites are being chopped off the first 10 results, whew!

    now i can say that im GOOD, but still a beginner in this field (not the kind that doesnt even know the crook and nooks but still novice nonetheless) who doesn’t when almost every second, there are changes being implemented in the search engines, there are new websites being launched, and the clients needs differs from person to person, and so much more.

  5. Andrew Turner says

    I find the acres of out of date search results as well as the acres of off topic search results are spam in themselves.
    I keep reading about googles expertise in delivering acurate search results, it totally amazes me.
    Why do people think it OK for them to serve up a load of dross when they have on subject up to daate pages indexed.
    Just wondering. I suppose its themoney thing as usual.

Leave a Reply